Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 07:42
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What is your review of "Regent", episode 5 of Season 2 House of the Dragon?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why don't men find fat women attractive?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are the reasons behind China and Russia's reluctance to integrate into the global economy?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Would deporting illegal aliens alleviate the housing crisis?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Can you share a story of someone who had a lucky experience while hitchhiking?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Trump, DOJ threaten Calif. with legal action, fines after trans athlete’s win - The Washington Post
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Beyond The Hype: What Apple's AI Warning Means For Business Leaders - Forbes
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Black holes don’t behave as we thought, study finds - The Brighter Side of News